Home Staging - A Danger to Buyers? Part 2
Posted Oct 1, 2007 @ 2:50 pm, Viewed by 562 Visitors, Read 569 Times.Please read Part 1 of this Blog before continuing.
First and foremost I find it absolutely ridiculous that NAEBA could caution buyers that many staging professionals, agents, and sellers would use staging to conceal structural defects. Sellers are obligated to list any known structural issues within their seller’s disclosure. This document is then given to buyers before any offers are made. I realize that certain sellers choose not to fill out a seller’s disclosure, yet these homes should be red flagged regardless of home staging.
Using the NAEBA example, which included a structural issue, disclosed by the neighbor, the seller must have had past knowledge. This means that had the staged home been purchased under false pretenses the buyer could have sued the seller for falsifying the seller’s disclosure. In the example the buyer attempted to offer a lower offer due to this defect and the seller declined. This is not illegal or even rare. In fact many homes which are not even staged become renegotiated contracts due to home inspection problems.
The next point that needs to be made regarding NAEBA’s inability to correctly portray home staging is again focused on the comments regarding staging as a way of hiding problems. Since NAEBA’s creation in 1995 did any of there real estate agents ever hear about home inspections? As real estate agents, who specifically focus on buyers only, NAEBA should know that buyers are given the right to hire a home inspector as one of the contingencies to buying the home. I have never met a home inspector that walks into a staged home and misses more problems then he/she would in a non-staged home. This means that every buyer no matter how emotionally blinded by staging tactics should receive a report about all of the problems found within a home. Once this is received the buyer has the right to negotiate further, accept the home as it is, or walk away from the contract. If a buyer decides to forgo this home inspection contingency he/she is already taking a chance on the home no matter how well staged the property is. In fact it is either this buyer’s decision making or the buyer’s agent’s advice that is the danger in this situation.
I personally love the quote, within the NAEBA article, that warns buyers of the dangers of staging by explaining that staging will make a home appear nicer without adding value to the home. Maybe the most obvious statement of all time this quote sums up marketing any product. When BMW releases a new line of cars the emotionally driven commercials do not add any value to the cars. What they do is help BMW sell the cars at a quicker pace. If NAEBA had real estate agents that worked on both sides of the real estate transaction they would realize that a seller staging a home is no different than a seller selecting a competitive price or offering buyer incentives. Each is just another way of promoting and marketing a home to attract as many buyers as possible.
What NAEBA fails to capture is that staging is not something that buyers should feel is a danger. Remember staging may not make a home more valuable over time, yet it does help buyers imagine a better use of space. In fact staging can help buyers realize how ideal a floor plan may be for their needs. A perfect example of this is in homes that are vacant. Many times empty rooms can cause a buyer to have trouble picturing the home with their own furniture. Staging helps buyers understand how useful a particular space can be.
The article suggests that stagers attempt to promote positives and diminish negatives, yet everything in sales is based on this principle. As a listing broker it is your job to promote each and every appealing aspect of a home and if buyers get emotionally attached it is not a negative thing. In fact buyers want to fall in love with a home. Buying a home is an emotional process. If a home fails to excite a buyer many times a buyer will not consider the purchase whether the home is staged or not. It is this emotion and love for a home this makes buyers bite. Warning these buyers that this feeling can be harmful is the opposite of what real estate is about. I love to see my buyers get excited about a home because it means I’ve done my job in finding them what they were looking for. These are the happy clients and the people that become repeat business time and time again.
In response to NAEBA’s quote, “in real estate there are an abundance of stories of buyers seeing a staged home, becoming emotionally attached, and paying over the market value for these homes” I also take exception. There is only one way for someone to define market value and that is by putting a home on the market. Where the home finally sells is that home’s market value. A buyer would never pay over the asking price unless there was a chance that another buyer was interested in the home. If two or more buyers are interested in the home and one offers more then the list price this buyer was not fooled by staging. In fact this means that the home was desirable and a new market price was defined for the home.
Just to play devil’s advocate and give NAEBA the benefit of the doubt let’s consider a home that has been on the market for a long time without any offers being made. If these sellers decide to stage the home and it sells for full asking price does this mean that the buyer was fooled by staging? Personally I do not think so. I feel that staging showed the home’s potential like never before. The buyer that NAEBA claims was fooled by staging still had the opportunity to compare this home with every other home on the market. Could it be that the buyer may have seen every other home and realized nothing could compare in his/her price range?
I also want to point out, one more paragraph that caused me, as a real estate professional, to wonder what NAEBA was thinking. The paragraph entitled, “Why the most sophisticated buyers often purchase homes that show poorly”, attempts to explain that smart buyers purchase homes in worse conditions because they realize that they are able to negotiate further. Statements like this make me wonder if the NAEBA would understand a buyer’s motivation if they tripped over it. Saving money is not the most important aspect to every buyer looking to buy a home. Certain buyers are driven by turn-key environments that allow them the ability to move right in without having to do any work. These buyers are willing to pay a little more money in order to save the hassle of doing work.
NAEBA fails to realize that we live in a world of people with different needs. This is why some shoppers buy clothes at Wal-Mart and some shop at Nieman Marcus or some people prefer Starbucks to Dunkin Donuts. Our society is built on the needs of different people and staging is just another way seller’s can appeal to the needs of these buyers. Labeling buyers as unsophisticated because of a difference in motivation is not only wrong, but ignorant. Any educated buyer representative would know that although homes in sub-par conditions can yield more flexibility at the negotiation table, many buyers are not interested in these homes. In real estate time is money and some buyers are willing to give up money to save time. It all depends on the needs of these buyers and until NAEBA begins to acknowledge this fact comments like this will continue to make real estate professionals look unprofessional.
Finally I want to conclude by acknowledging the NAEBA’s motive behind writing about the dangers of staging for buyers. I realize that the NAEBA was attempting to focus on the needs and defense of real estate buyers which is an honorable goal. They choose a topic as popular as staging because as the NAEBA put it “staging helps sellers gain more money from the sale of their home”. Although I agree with both NAEBA’s motive for the article and their theory about staging helping sellers; I do not agree with NAEBA’s assertion that by helping sellers staging is damaging buyers. As both a full-time Realtor and Accredited Staging Professional I can attest that a home will not sell unless priced correctly. This accounts for both staged homes and homes not staged. If a home is poorly priced buyers will not perceive the value. Staging will always appeal to buyers, yet not in an effort to trick these buyers. Staging promotes the finer characteristics of a home to help buyers see why the home is valuable.
As strictly buyer representatives NAEBA and its members are not seeing the whole picture. Remember after a first time buyer purchases a home they will now become sellers in the future. If NAEBA claims homes appear more valuable when staged these buyers turned sellers can also choose to use a professional home stager. Consequently, NAEBA should stop educating their readers about the ills of staging and continue to focus on the needs of buyers. Staging is a trend that will become more and more popular in the future; thus by avoiding these homes buyers will limit their options considerably.
NAEBA may continue to use scare tactics to attract readers and/or buyers, yet I hope anyone reading this response will acknowledge NAEBA’s tactics as just that. Sophisticated buyers may not all wish to buy homes which show poorly, yet they all strive to become more educated about the home buying process. Buying a home is complicated enough without having to worry about the “dangers of home staging”. The key to unlocking real estate success, as a buyer, is becoming educated enough to know the market, the inventory, and your needs. Once you grasp all three you will know when a home is right for you, whether staged or not. I wish you luck and would certainly appreciate any comments you may have regarding this or any other real estate topic.
If you would like to list your home, buy a home, or are just curious about real estate please contact me at (908) 656-3858 or email me at Michael-Pennisi@Burgdorff.com
The Key to Your Dream Home – www.MichaelPennisi.com
3 Responses to Home Staging - A Danger to Buyers? Part 2
Dear George, I did not have to accept your comment, yet I did for a reason. I appreciate your input and want to commend your wisdom. I also want to use your opinion to clarify certain aspects of my response to NAEBA's report and article. For starters I by no means wanted to come off as being egotistical. In life everyone no matter how educated and masterful can learn. I learn something new everyday I live and this applies double to my knowledge of real estate. If I have sounded over confident I apologize. Although I completely agree that everyone is entitled to opinion I also agree that certain groups, organizations, and individuals should be held to a higher standard. The difference being that certain groups, organizations, and individuals have a fidiciary responsibility to the public in which they serve. When a blogger comments on a random website the public may take the information with a grain of salt. When the president of a nationally recognized real estate organization writes an article that he/she uses to represent an opinion to be fact the public is much more likely to listen and believe. Therefore if this opinion does not represent the truth regarding various aspects of the topic readers will be misled into believing the opinion. In the case of NAEBA's article I read it with the intention of learning from their president's wisdom and expertise. Once I concluded the article I was shocked at the fact that many of the points noted were false. If I, as a real estate professional, read the article expecting to hear a valid opinion based on factual information then I assume many buyers will be doing the same. Especially since the article was featured on Realtor.org Personally I feel Realtor.org's writers and editors did a tremendous job with the article they wrote. They remained diplomatic and made sure to point out aspects of both sides of the staging topic. Could I have been just as diplomatic? Of course and taking the high road is an honorable position to take. The difference, however, is that the high road in this situation would have been condoning the NAEBA's abuse of power. As a nationally recognized and respected real estate organization I feel NAEBA should have produced a more scholarly document. I might have agreed that staging was detrimental to the interests of buyers if they had proven their point with fact and legitimate statistics. Instead NAEBA used flimsy opinion deep rooted in a lack of overall knowledge of the real estate process. Additionally and more importantly I found the comments made by the NAEBA article to be offensive. By concluding that buyers are unsophisticated if they purchase turn-key homes and home staging professionals are the enemy to buyers, NAEBA's president labeled both groups inaccurately. I have many buyers that are extremely sophisticated, yet would never consider buying a home in poor condition. These people do not deserve to be insulted due to varying motivations. I also believe that NAEBA's president made staging professionals seem like sneaky corrupt individuals that would do anything to fool a buyer. As an individual who treats all clients fairly I feel it is important to stand up against this negative stigmitism. As I mentioned above I do not feel like I am better then NAEBA nor do I think that opinions different from my own should be condemned. I constantly read and listen to other's opinions and usually will leave positve comments regarding articles, blogs, etc that deserve the recognition. Although this may be true I also feel it is important to comment on opinions or "facts" that I know to be inaccurate. It is crucial for those that know the truth to let the truth be heard. This applies to comments made by the NAEBA, myself, or anyone for that matter. If I am wrong I hope someone would tell me because without this honesty it is difficult to learn. This is what education is about. It matters not who is right or wrong, but it does matter that both opinions be heard and presented with facts. In regards to my response, I do wish to apologize to members of NAEBA who did not agree with your president's article. It was wrong of me to make statements pertaining to all members when I was only reading the words of one. In this aspect I do apologize wholeheartedly. I hope this helps clarify my intentions, motivations, and actions. I also want to thank you once again for your comment because it was certainly an opinion that caused me to think.
This is possibly the best reaction to the NAEBA report that I have read so far. I totally agree with everything you've said and see that you have completely examined the entire report. Before I was a stager, I worked in real estate finance. I am very familiar with disclosures and the required paperwork. Stagers can't hide anything that is disclosed. Instead we tell homeowners to repair (not hide) all issues before even considering showing the home. Besides, a good buyer's agent would suggest they have the home inspected before signing any paperwork. The report angers me and I hope it will disappear soon. Something I'd like to point out is that this survey's participants were only NAEBA members, therefore the results only reflect the opinions of a small biased group. If NAEBA had polled a variety of real estate agents, not just its members, the results would have been completely different...maybe even accurate. I hope more people are able to see through this report as we were able to. Thanks for the great posts.
REW Blogs User Stats
Currently Online Users:
0
Total Users:
2,389
Entries:
7,605
Unique Views:
6,449,497
Total Views:
6,787,326
Total Comments:
9,372
Total REW Points:
510
I specialize in helping my clients with buying and selling a home in Summit, New Providence, Berkeley Heights, Millburn, Short Hills, Chatham, Westfield, South Orange, Maplewood, Long Hill Township, Murray Hill Farm, Union County, Essex County, Morris County, and Somerset County, New Jersey. Read More
- This User's Stats
-
Blog Entries: 16Average Blog Rating: 0Unique Views: 9,280Total Views: 9,592Comments Posted: 3Comments Received: 9REW Points: 0
Rate this Post!
Share this Post
Print
Social Bookmarking
Contact Me
RSS Feed
Top Rated
REW Blogs RSS Feed
We all may be benifited to remember that many folks are totally ignorant to some aspects of Real Estate, and hear all kinds of horror stories regarding agents or anyone related to the industry. Education is a positive, no matter what field we are in, though we must remember to keep our egos' in check and use some humility, which actually works, and people truly enjoy someone telling them the truth, and following up with what they say they will or will not do, and it matters not what profession we are in. We must not be too quick to be critical of what is written, as opinions are what makes the world go round, and everything we read or write needs a grain of salt to go with it.