<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <atom:link href="http://www.realestatewebmasters.com/blogs/rachelvanderveen/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <title>REW Blogs : Real Estate Webmasters Blogging Platform</title>
        <link>http://www.realestatewebmasters.com/blogs/rachelvanderveen/</link>
        <description>REW Blogs is the blogging platform provided by Real Estate Webmasters.com - Millions of Readers and a great community is what you will find here. </description>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.realestatewebmasters.com/blogs/rachelvanderveen/26751/show/</guid>
            <link>http://www.realestatewebmasters.com/blogs/rachelvanderveen/26751/show/</link>
            <dc:creator>RachelVanderveen</dc:creator>
                        <title>Couple Sues Realtor over Double Murder House</title>
            <description> <![CDATA[ <p>I was browsing some articles over the inter-web and stumbled
across an article from the Toronto Sun. Essentially what happened
was that a couple from Ontario purchased a house where a gruesome
double murder had taken place 15 years prior. I wont go into the
awfulness too much, but it involved a child and multiple stabbings.
The sellers of the property purchased it after the murder had taken
place, lived in it for a few years, and then listed it for sale
without disclosing the homes sordid history. The couple who
purchased the home completed all the paper work and entered into a
legally binding contract with the sellers. After this had taken
place, and before they moved in, they found out about what had
occurred in the home and attempted to get out of the sale, but were
advised by their lawyer that they had no legal grounds to do so. So
they completed the sale at the full purchase price. Upon moving in,
they began to suffer emotionally and shortly thereafter initiated
the lawsuit against the buyers real estate brokerage and the
sellers which is before the courts today.</p>
<p>In my mind, anyone who knew about the history of this property
and did not disclose it to the buyers is guilty as charged. There
have been many discussions over the years regarding whether homes
with bad history---even if its a psychological history---qualify
as having a material latent defect. A material latent defect as
defined by RECA is:</p>
<p>&ldquo;<strong>defects that render a property dangerous or potentially
dangerous, unfit for habitation, or unfit for the purpose for which
the buyer is acquiring it (where the buyer has made this known),
and may include defects that would involve great expense to remedy,
local authority notices that prejudicially affect the property and
lack of appropriate permits.&rdquo;</strong></p>
<p>To me a double murder in a home is certainly a defect that would
involve great expense to remedy because, in many cases, its
priceless. You cant put a price on fixing the history. You can gut
the place and completely redo it, but it wont change the
disturbing facts about what happened between those walls. I would
wager that only half the population would consider living in that
home when priced at full market value, and only three-quarters
would consider living there if the home was priced far below market
value. Theres absolutely no good reason why this should not have
been disclosed by the sellers, the sellers agent, and the buyers
agent (if they had any knowledge of it.)</p>
<p><strong>Two questions for you:</strong></p>
<p>1) Would you ever consider living in a home with this type of
past?</p>
<p>2) Do you think the sellers, and sellers brokerage had a duty
to disclose?</p>
 ]]> </description>
            <pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 12:16:53 -0800</pubDate>
                    </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.realestatewebmasters.com/blogs/rachelvanderveen/26504/show/</guid>
            <link>http://www.realestatewebmasters.com/blogs/rachelvanderveen/26504/show/</link>
            <dc:creator>RachelVanderveen</dc:creator>
                        <title>The Upper Hand</title>
            <description> <![CDATA[ <p>For all of my hopes and dreams of being kind, considerate, and
fair with other agents, today I decided that there is a small group
of agents where common courtesy, and mutual respect unfortunately
does not work. These are the types who are just infinitely
aggressive and confrontational despite your best efforts to be firm
and professional. I literally just came up with this today, so give
me some feedback if you think Im off base.</p>
<p>Ive been working with an agent who is just purely cantankerous.
I cant think of a better word than that. This individual---I
discovered over the weekend---sees my attempts at courtesy and
kindness as a weakness, and Ive concluded that this person is
trying to take advantage of that by speaking over top of me,
refusing to listen, and just straight-up making negotiations
impossible.</p>
<p>This person is one of three people Ive worked with in all my
years in the business who are forcing me to reevaluate my approach
to agents with personalities like this person has.</p>
<p>Its making me think about the upper hand.</p>
<p>With the majority of agents in Calgary, you dont need to
bluster and blow and run about like peacock brandishing ones
feathers in the form of character attacks. My dealings with most
agents, have proven to show two individuals working together to get
the best deal for their clients. You dont budge on the things you
want for your client, but neither do you get nasty: yelling and
attacking your opponents character, or refusing to listen to the
other person speak.</p>
<p>I found myself in the middle of one of these heated discussions
this weekend, and Im sad to admit that it picked my anger bone and
I sank to this persons level in some places. Vanderveen fail.</p>
<p>But what Im taking away is to always bring it back to the
basics. I realized some things I should have done to diffuse the
bomb before it went off.</p>
<p>1) I should have presented offers and counter offers as is, and
refused to engage in arguments until this individual had spoken to
their clients. This person kept negotiating with me on the phone
before they had spoken to their clients. I know they are not
allowed to do that, and it just creates conflict. I should have
insisted on this agent taking my offer back to their clients and
waited for a counter offer which I could then write down and take
back to my clients. It makes for a whole lot less to discuss.
Instead I got hooked into a back and forth, which added heat to the
fire. There are some people where discussions are not meant to be
had over the phone, which brings me to&hellip;</p>
<p>2) I should have switched communication to email and text only
at the first sign that things were getting fractious. This would
have ensured that I could outline my clients reasons for offers
and counters and actually be heard and understood without all the
posturing in between. This would have alleviated a lot of
miscommunication which I think was occurring because the other
agent spoke English as a second language. If I had taken the time
to type everything out, it would have made this agent feel less
intimated because of a lack of understanding English. I finally
realized after everything was said and done, that this agent was
frustrated because this agent could not understand our counters,
but was too proud to ask me to explain it again. The agent would
angrily respond to our counters based on what they <em>thought</em>
they heard, rather than what I actually said. At which point, I
would repeat myself again in a different way, explaining that I had
already explained this to them twice. Once the agent understood
that I had already addressed previous concerns in previous
counters, and that they just didnt understand what I said, I
surmise that they felt ashamed or embarrassed for having made such
a huge angry deal out of something they just did not translate
properly, rather than an actual, real issue.</p>
<p>I think that when a person gets into a conflict like this, we
tend to think that the &ldquo;upper hand,&rdquo; is being louder, meaner and
more aggressive. But I really think this didnt get me anywhere. I
think the upper hand would have been insisting on a following a
fact-based framework, and insisting on a mode of communication that
decreases the risk of misunderstanding.</p>
<p>Hindsight is always 20/20.</p>
<p>You know at the end of everything, Im pretty sure Ive made an
enemy out of this agent. My heart side says, &ldquo;Who cares! This agent
is a %^&amp;*U&amp;^&amp;(O*&amp;. I dont care if this agent takes
a long walk off a short dock!&rdquo; But my head (and my logical husband)
says: why make enemies? Theres no sense. For every terrible nasty
personality that I encounter in this business, I always think I
could have done better when all is said and done. I always think I
could have done more to discover what made this person so angry. If
I had given credence to the language barrier at the beginning, Im
pretty sure it would have been a smoother deal, and I wouldnt be
sitting at my desk right now with an ice cream tub, typing with one
hand and emotionally eating with the other.</p>
<p>***I tried to make this as anonymous and gender neutral as
possible, because I have no desire for anyone to find out who my
nightmare agent is. So if I used the wrong gender pronoun
somewhere, cut me a break. Its not easy to eat ice cream and type
a blog.</p>
 ]]> </description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 12:27:27 -0700</pubDate>
                    </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.realestatewebmasters.com/blogs/rachelvanderveen/26406/show/</guid>
            <link>http://www.realestatewebmasters.com/blogs/rachelvanderveen/26406/show/</link>
            <dc:creator>RachelVanderveen</dc:creator>
                        <title>Top 10 Most Annoying Things Other Real Estate Agents Do</title>
            <description> <![CDATA[ <p>10) Not confirm showing requests within an hour.</p>
<p>9) Put Misleading things on listings like entering $300/month
for the condo fee, but then writing &ldquo;Seller agrees to pay half of
the condo fees for one year&rdquo; in the private agents comments.
(Meaning that the monthly condo fee is actually $600/month.)</p>
<p>8) Not educate their clients about the absolute <em>need</em> to
show the property every <em>single</em> time it is requested, and
thusly decline requests based on their clients dinner plans. (Or
because it is Stampede. See blog about this topic <a href=
"http://www.realestatewebmasters.com/blogs/rachelvanderveen/25956/show/">
here</a>).</p>
<p>7) Be aggressive and antagonistic in the negotiation
process.</p>
<p>6) Write sloppy contracts: missing fields, using the term &ldquo;tbv&rdquo;
anywhere or anytime on a legal contract, illegible writing, 500
faxes before it hits your desk so it looks like a black blob on
white paper.</p>
<p>5) Page you with a message to phone them back and providing you
with a phone number that sends you to <em>their</em> paging
service.</p>
<p>4) Insist on talking everything through in person. Cant we text
or call? Its 2012. If youre not in my iPhone, I cant understand
you.</p>
<p>3) Wear shirts that say, &ldquo;Its Five OClock Somewhere.&rdquo; I
actually have never seen an agent do this, but my husband, Clint,
is wearing one today as he works at finishing the basement, and I
found it particularly annoying and therefore worth mentioning.</p>
<p>2) Not respond to a message indicating I have an offer within a
half hour.</p>
<p>1)</p>
<p>I left 1 open for you. What do you think is the most annoying
thing other agents do?</p>
 ]]> </description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 13:59:21 -0700</pubDate>
                    </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.realestatewebmasters.com/blogs/rachelvanderveen/26326/show/</guid>
            <link>http://www.realestatewebmasters.com/blogs/rachelvanderveen/26326/show/</link>
            <dc:creator>RachelVanderveen</dc:creator>
                        <title>New Movie Theatre Near Auburn Bay, Cranston &amp; Mahogany!</title>
            <description> <![CDATA[ <p>This could possibly be the most exciting thing I have heard all
day! Cineplex is building a movie theatre in Seton! Right by our
house! So for those of you movie lovers who have been looking for a
movie theatre near McKenzie Towne, New Brighton, Copperfield,
Auburn Bay, Cranston, or Mahogany your agonizing wait is over! I
was one of those poor fools who was suckered into believing that
the Lowes that just went up at 130th was going to be a theatre,
until they started construction and I the building was
conspicuously un-theatre-like in its shape.</p>
<p>The Calgary Herald reports that our new theatre will feature, &ldquo;A
43,000-square-foot, 11-screen theatre with three VIP auditoriums &mdash;
the first of their kind in Calgary &mdash; as well as an UltraAVX
auditorium and seven traditional auditoriums.&rdquo; It looks like the
VIP rooms will offer patrons service to your seat with an expanded
menu and selection of appetizers, child-free environment, bigger
seats, their own check-in, and likely a premium price. In the
famous words of Liz Lemon: &ldquo;I want to go to there!&rdquo; Ill probably
skip the VIP section because I am far too Dutch to shell out the
extra cash for a bit of panache, but Im excited to finally have a
theatre in the SE, and pack in shoulder to shoulder with fellow
SE-dwelling comrades!</p>
<p>As for the rest of construction of the commercial phase of
Seton, 130,000 square feet of space in phase one is currently under
construction with an estimated opening date of Summer 2013!</p>
 ]]> </description>
            <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 13:18:48 -0700</pubDate>
                    </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.realestatewebmasters.com/blogs/rachelvanderveen/26105/show/</guid>
            <link>http://www.realestatewebmasters.com/blogs/rachelvanderveen/26105/show/</link>
            <dc:creator>RachelVanderveen</dc:creator>
                        <title>Calgary New Home Builders: Why They Hate Us</title>
            <description> <![CDATA[ <p>For years and years, I have walked into showhomes, identified
myself as an agent, and then endured a not-so-subtle stink eye from
the sales staff until I left the building. I have never known why
they hate us so much. I mean, Ive had a few good ideas, but
nothing definitive. However, 2 days ago I happened to walk into a
showhome while doing research for a client and chanced to meet one
of the loveliest ladies I have encountered in a while. We ended up
warming up quite quickly, and so I asked the question that I have
been longing to be bold enough to ask for many years.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Saleslady,&rdquo; (I know her name but I wont &ldquo;out&rdquo; her here) &ldquo;Why
do new home salespeople hate us so much?&rdquo; I asked.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Oh,&rdquo; She shook her head and then went on to say, &ldquo;So many
reasons...&rdquo;</p>
<p>We had a good laugh about this, and I snatched up my pen and
notepad, showing her I was ready to take notes. Over the next hour,
I received an education from a very generous lady. Here is what I
found.</p>
<p>1) Salespeople in new homes lose commission when an agent walks
in. Which I already kind of knew, but she confirmed that it was
true and to varying degrees by builder. Apparently some builders
are worse than others in terms of compensating the staff well when
an agent brings in a buyer. There are conditions under which its
fine when an agent comes in and helps, and there are conditions
under which is it not fine. But agents have to remember that the
salespeople are there from contract to keys, which agents are too,
but its pretty rare for us to have a deal that doesnt close for
9-12 months. This is par for the course for new home sales people
in Calgary.</p>
<p>2) When an agent comes in after a client has had many, many
appointments with the sales centre and then demands a cheque, that
is not cool. The sales staff has done all the work up until that
point, and this kind of behavior is surprisingly not so uncommon,
and its one of the main reasons why salespeople hate us.</p>
<p>3) Sometimes agents come in with a combative and aggressive
attitude, pitting buyer against builder, instead of trying to find
a mutually satisfactory deal for buyer and builder. This attitude
tends to spread throughout the whole transaction, and the
salespeople have to put up with it for 9-12 months while the home
is being built, and then another year on the warranty end.
Injecting this type of attitude is another reason why they hate
us.</p>
<p>4) Agents come into the show home and dont identify themselves,
and cause sales staff to spend more time with them then they would
if it was a member of the public. This sounds bad, but the
expectation is that agents should know more and be able to educate
their clients in lieu of salespeople. This lightens the load for
the salespeople and thus makes it worth it for them to lose a chunk
of their commission. Obviously agents dont know the price or
product of the showhomes, but once armed with that knowledge, they
can educate their buyers on the best value lots to buy, the best
value for upgrades, and help them conceptualize their
financing.</p>
<p>5) Agents dont show up for appointments, which, again, causes
the salespeople to have to pick up the slack for half the
income.</p>
<p><em>How Can We Stop the Hate?</em></p>
<p>Basically, she told me to just do the opposite of the above five
points. Stop doing those things, and you should be able to reduce
the level of hatred, or even move into a place of mutual respect,
as I experienced with this wonderful lady. I should say that I
dont think the majority of agents behave in this way, and I
certainly dont, but sometimes a few bad apples can spoil
batch.</p>
 ]]> </description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 09:29:16 -0700</pubDate>
                    </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.realestatewebmasters.com/blogs/rachelvanderveen/25956/show/</guid>
            <link>http://www.realestatewebmasters.com/blogs/rachelvanderveen/25956/show/</link>
            <dc:creator>RachelVanderveen</dc:creator>
                        <title>10 VALID Reasons to Decline a Showing</title>
            <description> <![CDATA[ <p>So I tried to book a showing about 2 days ago and I was declined
by the seller. The reason? Its Stampede week. Thats what I was
told. By the agent. This is just so far beyond the realm of
ludicrous, that I have decided to post a reference here for sellers
(and their agents) of the only 10 valid reasons to decline a
showing when your home is listed for sale.</p>
<p>1) An <em>immediate</em> family member is dead or is the process
of dying.</p>
<p>2) Part of the home has been lost through a devastating house
fire.</p>
<p>3) Christ has come back and raptured his believers up to
heaven.</p>
<p>4) Dinosaurs have taken over the earth and shut down all major
roadways, and youre stuck at work. (Please note that if the
roadways are <em>not</em> shut down, you <em>still</em> must show
the home.)</p>
<p>5) There is a western-style shoot-out occurring on the road in
front of the home which is occurring less than 40 paces from your
front door. (If its more than 40 you still must show).</p>
<p>6) The septic system has exploded all over the basement.</p>
<p>7) The half human alien thingys from <em>I am Legend</em> have
taken over the city. (Please note that this only prevents night
time showings. You must still show through the day when buyers are
able to safely evaluate the home without the threat of being
dismembered by the mutants.)</p>
<p>8) Spontaneous hydro dental implosion.</p>
<p>9) City-wide communicable disease quarantine.</p>
<p>10) Wildfires 10 meters or <em>less</em> from your front
step.</p>
<p>I hope this is helpful!</p>
 ]]> </description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 15:43:10 -0700</pubDate>
                    </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.realestatewebmasters.com/blogs/rachelvanderveen/25915/show/</guid>
            <link>http://www.realestatewebmasters.com/blogs/rachelvanderveen/25915/show/</link>
            <dc:creator>RachelVanderveen</dc:creator>
                        <title>House for Sale. Pitbull NOT Included</title>
            <description> <![CDATA[ <p>So, I drive up to a showing yesterday, and there is a PITBULL
standing on the front porch. He is tied up, but hes on a 15 foot
leash. I instantly flipped out, and refused to show the property. I
apologized to my clients (one of whom is <em>vastly pregnant</em>)
and was ready to get back in the vehicle, when one of my buyers
decided to pull the leash and secure the dog so we could all enter.
(I <em>still</em> did not want to show the property, but the buyer
wanted to see it, so as long as he was able to keep the dog at bay,
I was willing to open the door).</p>
<p>When we left the showing, the lock was broken and would not
close. Eventually, we left the door open, and got into the van. I
was steaming. I was fuming. I was seeing red.</p>
<p>Its just so disrespectful.</p>
<p>Is it not, people? Please weigh in here, and tell me if Im
being totally irrational here. Im interested in some opinions.</p>
<p>So I ring the agent, and explain what just happened, and hes
cool as a cucumber.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Yah, dont worry about that dog. Hes a good dog. He isnt
gonna do nuthin to ya,&rdquo; He says, and he just leaves it at that.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Well I am sorry, sir,&rdquo; I exclaim, &ldquo;But not everyone shares your
feelings about PITBULLS.&rdquo;</p>
<p>He didnt say much after that. Didnt even apologize. I let him
know that the door was left open and that none of us felt like
sticking around long enough to diagnose the problem with the broken
lock because of the pitbull. He was pretty nonchalant about the
whole thing.</p>
<p>Ive never seen anything like it. In all my days of real
estate.</p>
<p>OK. Lets just forget about actual physical safety and respect
for your fellow REALTORS. Lets just put that aside. But tell me:
how in the WORLD are you doing this client any favours by allowing
him to keep a pitbull on site? You have to KNOW that his home isnt
going to sell. You have KNOW that buyers will be totally turned
off. You have to KNOW that agents will get to the property and
refuse to show. How? Why? WHY? (Im sputtering like an old car here
now.)</p>
<p>OK, now its your turn. Please tell me if Im being WAAAAY too
uptight about this. Whats your take? Go:</p>
 ]]> </description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 12:10:56 -0700</pubDate>
                    </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.realestatewebmasters.com/blogs/rachelvanderveen/25909/show/</guid>
            <link>http://www.realestatewebmasters.com/blogs/rachelvanderveen/25909/show/</link>
            <dc:creator>RachelVanderveen</dc:creator>
                        <title>Touchbase and Shag Carpets</title>
            <description> <![CDATA[ <p>Yesterday, I Touchbased out a request for a showing, and I had
to call the agent back a few hours later to get the confirmation
because he didnt respond to the Touchbase. The agent who held the
listing was upset that I even dared to use Touchbase, and proceeded
to dive into a long diatribe about why agents just cant call each
other anymore. &ldquo;Why all this texting and Touchbasing?&rdquo; He said.</p>
<p>Poor guy is fighting an uphill battle all on his own.</p>
<p>There is a resistance to technology in the Calgary real estate
industry. Its <em>small</em>, but its there. One by one, I think
these agents who cant stand the lack of personal interaction in
real estate, are getting iPhones and realizing there is a whole new
world out there.</p>
<p>A world that serves our clients better.</p>
<p>The difference in the technological landscape in our industry is
totally different even from only five years ago. If you dont use
Touchbase or Call to View, how are you keeping up with showings? We
have a market in Calgary that moves lightning quick, <em>even</em>
if were in a slow market. Sometimes, youll get a request for a
showing as people are standing outside your property. If you dont
respond right away, you will have most likely lost that showing,
and every lost showing is the potential loss of an offer or a
multiple offer. Buyers attention spans are often as short as my
two year olds. They find what they want on the internet in 20
minutes flat. They call their agent in five minutes, and in the
next couple of hours, theyre on the road looking at properties. If
you dont catch them on that tour, you might have lost them.</p>
<p>I get the resistance to technology. Its hard to accept
something new, especially when you fundamentally dont understand
it. Its kind of the way I feel about shag carpet.</p>
<p>Call to View and Touchbase are one of the most beautiful aspects
of the new technology in Calgary Real Estate. If youre an agent in
Calgary who does not know how to use Touchbase or how to connect it
to your cell phone, give me and Clint a call and well gladly get
you up and running for the small charge of two Tim Hortons
double-doubles.(Size of beverage to be determined in direct
relation to age of your cell phone). :)</p>
 ]]> </description>
            <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 08:34:43 -0700</pubDate>
                    </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.realestatewebmasters.com/blogs/rachelvanderveen/25801/show/</guid>
            <link>http://www.realestatewebmasters.com/blogs/rachelvanderveen/25801/show/</link>
            <dc:creator>RachelVanderveen</dc:creator>
                        <title>How to Stop the Zombie Spider Apocalypse </title>
            <description> <![CDATA[ <p>I hate spiders. I really do. Its amazing to Clint that
something that is a fraction of my size can cause me to jump up
onto furniture, and try to climb walls just to escape even the idea
of a spider. Small, big, I dont care. Theyre all evil little
creatures bent on world domination, in my estimation, and I dont
want anything to do with them.</p>
<p>Last year we started seeing big, ugly, awful, man-eating spiders
in our windows in our humble little abode in Auburn Bay. After I
calmed down from even seeing them from behind the safety of a
window, I sent Clint on a spy mission to see where all the spiders
were coming from. They were <em>everywhere</em> like <em>all
over</em> the exterior of our house. After telling a few friends
about this phenomenon, I learned that friends in McKenzie Towne,
Cranston, Copperfield, and Mahogany were having the exact same
issues. (See, I know Im not crazy. Im not the first one to
predict the zombie spider apocalypse). I sent Clint out right away
to buy something strong from Home Depot. I told him to do anything
and <em>everything</em> to get rid of them: mustard gas, tear gas,
nuclear warfare, I dont care. Just GET them!</p>
<p>He came back and sprayed the exterior of our home with something
I can only assume could burn through concrete. The spiders were
gone&hellip;.until THIS year. And here we are again. The spiders are back
all over the exterior of our house, biding their time until they
can fully envelop us with their webs of doom, and sacrifice our
children to their spider gods.</p>
<p>I took to the internet to find a few solutions to get rid of
them, and presently, Clint is on his way to Home Depot to begin our
revolution. Heres what I found:</p>
<p>1) Diatomaceous Earth</p>
<p>Having decided that putting chemicals around the perimeter of my
home where my children play <em>might</em> not have been the wisest
choice, I looked into this less chemically offensive alternative.
Its a naturally occurring substance. It basically dehydrates the
offending critters when they come into contact with it. Sprinkle
this stuff around places where the little devils tend to want to
come in: piping, wire entries, and windows and doors.</p>
<p>2) Weather Stripping</p>
<p>Make sure you have these in place and they are fully
functioning. These little guys are always looking for an entry way
to terrorize you and your family. This is one of their best
routes.</p>
<p>3) Mint Tea</p>
<p>Spiders have taste buds in their feet, and they dont like the
taste of this stuff. This is one that is safe and clean to use
<em>inside</em> the house. You can put the tea bags in doorways,
windows and other openings. The fresh smell in the house isnt a
bad side benefit either.</p>
<p>4) Caulking</p>
<p>Make sure water pipes, and sinks are all caulked preventing any
entry of these awful creatures.</p>
<p>5) Chestnuts</p>
<p>This is another scent that spiders dont take kindly to. Crack
the nuts and place them where you dont want the arachnids to
enter. Youll need to replace them every so often to keep the scent
strong.</p>
<p>6) Fogger</p>
<p>And, finally, for those of you who have done everything and
youre still in a bad way, fog it. (I have to say after writing
this blog, Ive already texted Clint and asked him to pick up some
fogger.) Be sure to read the instructions to make sure that the
chemical you buy is not harmful to children or animals.</p>
 ]]> </description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:58:13 -0700</pubDate>
                    </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.realestatewebmasters.com/blogs/rachelvanderveen/25719/show/</guid>
            <link>http://www.realestatewebmasters.com/blogs/rachelvanderveen/25719/show/</link>
            <dc:creator>RachelVanderveen</dc:creator>
                        <title>The Clients Who Made Me Cry</title>
            <description> <![CDATA[ <p>Clint and I often think back on the only clients who ever made
me cry. Not at home in private, like right in front of their faces
out of sheer exasperation.</p>
<p>I feel it is <em>only</em> <em>fair</em> to note that I
<em>was</em> hugely pregnant at the time.</p>
<p>It was a couple. Looking for a revenue property. We stumbled
upon a foreclosure that they liked, and they just could not
understand the deal with how Calgary banks tend to deal with
chattels on their foreclosure listings. Admittedly, the chattel
aspect of buying a foreclosure can be super-confusing (see my blog
explanation of foreclosure chattels <a href=
"http://www.vanderveenteam.com/blog/calgary-foreclosures-lets-talk-about-chattels.html">
here</a>), but I felt---and still feel---that I explained it over
and over and to the very best of my ability. They just didnt get
it, and they wanted me to personally guarantee the chattels, which
I was certainly not willing to do!</p>
<p>We got past the chattel aspect and actually wrote an offer. We
submitted it to the bank, which normally requires anywhere from
48-72 hours to get back to potential buyers of their foreclosures.
(See my blog on that <a href=
"http://www.vanderveenteam.com/blog/calgary-foreclosures-your-offer-the-banks-counter-and-the-time-in-between.html">
here</a>). But <em>this</em> time, they didnt get back to us even
<em>four days</em> after we submitted. I phoned the agent
representing the bank multiple times daily to find out if there was
any progress (bordering on stalking), but there was none. The bank
just simply hadnt gotten to our offer yet. Having been in the
listing agents position many times before, I knew there was
nothing we could do about it but wait. The bank is the bank. You
cant move them with a tractor. They get to things when they get to
things. Every day that passed my buyer got increasingly agitated.
He often barked orders to me on the phone, and Clint would reach
over top of me trying to take the phone out of my hand to give him
a piece of his mind. I had to dodge Clint and just hang onto the
phone and try to keep things cordial. I think my buyer was feeling
insulted that the bank didnt come back to us, thinking it was a
personal slight from the bank to him. I tried everything I could to
explain that it was not personal; its just how the bank rolls. He
was still angry. So, so, so angry.</p>
<p>I met with the buyers on the fifth day (still with no response
from the bank) and they blasted me. The guy was even straight up
yelling at me! In public! They said it was my fault that the bank
wasnt getting back to them, and that I was lying about having
submitted the offer. They accused me of <em>not</em> submitting the
offer!!! Why would any agent not submit an offer? An accepted offer
means weve done our job and were going to get paid!</p>
<p>What can you do, right? I burst into tears (and believe me,
people, I am <em>not</em> easily given to tears) and said to them
that there just wasnt anything that I could do for them anymore.
The tears just flowed despite my trying to stop them from pouring
down my face. I asked to be released from my agency obligations
with them, and they allowed me to terminate. Ive never had someone
be so angry with me. I literally cant recall a time that anyone in
my life, business or personal, was just so angry with me and not
shy to show it. They had just made me feel so small throughout the
process, and I was hormonal&hellip;</p>
<p>And those were the ones that made me cry.</p>
<p>Epilogue:</p>
<p>The bank finally got back to me <em>seven</em> days later, and I
told them that the buyers had lost interest in the property.</p>
 ]]> </description>
            <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 10:33:44 -0700</pubDate>
                    </item>
    </channel>
</rss>