Comparing and contrasting Roosevelt Lofts to 1100 Wilshire
condos. Prices and square footage being equal, I'd choose
Roosevelt. But the market reality is that 1100 Wilshire is about
$150,000 cheaper for a similar sized unit, now what? Which is
better now?
1100 Wilshire with a view and $150,000 cheaper? I'd take 1100
Wilshire in a heartbeat. As good as Roosevelt is, I believe, a
skyline view is still desirable and worth something. Unfortunately,
the market forces are such that 1100 Wilshire is currently selling
at a pretty good discount. What are those forces? First, 1100
Wilshire units were on sale a few years ago, which means current
sellers paid less for their units relative to construction costs.
Second, Roosevelt lofts are currently being sold direct by the
developer, and as a result, the prices have to be held steady in
order to maintain market values for the units that have already
been purchased. Whether Roosevelt will remain $150,000 more
expensive 2 years from now when these units go back on the market
remains to be seen. But as an investment today, a unit with a view
at 1100 Wilshire that is over $150,000 cheaper has more upside than
the same sized unit at Roosevelt. Of course, what good is an
investment if you can't stand to live in it? As long as you ENJOY
living in the building, then the investment aspect is secondary. A
home's value to its owner is more than just dollars and cents
sometimes.
Be the first to share your thoughts!
© Copyright Real Estate Webmasters 2004-2010, All Rights Reserved. Terms of Service