+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Question MSN results

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Sarasota, Florida
    Posts
    1,069

    Default Question MSN results

    I have a new website targeting Bradenton, Florida that is about 3-4 weeks old. It is already #5 for "Bradenton Real Estate". How can that be?

    Obviously, backlinks are not that important to MSN.
    Marc Rasmussen is selling luxury Sarasota real estate. Updated daily with all Sarasota Florida real estate.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Nashville
    Posts
    507

    Default Re: Question MSN results

    Nope, it seems like backlinks are not valued at all. MSN goes with your meta tags, keyword density, and on page content that uses your keywords towards the top of the page. I have been #1 or #2 on MSN for almost 2 months now and have only converted 1 customer...more worried about G!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    902

    Default Re: Question MSN results

    I remember anyone who used the digit point mass link exchange program would pretty much instantly rank in MSN with tons of links and a decently optimized page. Links are very valued on MSN and Yahoo, Just less regulated then Google... But yes, Meta tags seem to hold more weight in M and Y!

    Plus That's not a very tough KW.....Only 238,517 pages to compete against..
    My Main KW has over 6,000,000.
    Last edited by SanDiego; 07-06-2005 at 08:47 PM.
    Search Homes for Sale in SAN DIEGO and other San Diego Real Estate via the San Diego MLS.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Key West, FL
    Posts
    499

    Default Re: Question MSN results

    Quote Originally Posted by MarcinSarasota
    I have a new website targeting Bradenton, Florida that is about 3-4 weeks old. It is already #5 for "Bradenton Real Estate". How can that be?

    Obviously, backlinks are not that important to MSN.
    You are right. MSN does not give much weight to links. MSN is improving their ability, with what they call 'neural net', to recognize and reward good content. You could say that they are content-centric while Google is link-centric. I wish them success because if they succeed then the other SEs will out-of-necessity be forced to value content over links. Wouldn't it be a better web, and less spammy, if SEOs and webmasters spent as much time improving content as they do searching for links?

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts