Real Estate Forums

Linking Strategies Discuss effective strategies for increasing links to your real estate websites

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 09-07-2005, 09:58 PM
Cecil's Avatar
Cecil Cecil is offline
Real Estate WebMaster
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 142
Cecil is on a distinguished road
Default Directory vs Content link trades

I'm hearing more and more people obsess over the idea that they only want content page link trades instead of directory link trades.

First off...I agree. Content page trades are more valuable IF the links are surrounded by text and placed in a content friendly logical location within the page. If we're talking about a text link with anchor text only in a table with a bunch of other text links with anchor text only I'd say they aren't any more valuable than a directory link with nice descriptions after each link.

That said, I think people undervalue the weight that google places on directories. As long as the directory is well done with good sized description text after each link, google is treating those pages and their links with great respect. Last time I checked, >2% of my total traffic was COMING IN from my directory pages. There was no significant optimization on that directory. It was just a directory of quality links with quality descriptions. And those descriptions capture people. In fact they still do.

I've seen a few people who feel that a few anchor text only links tucked in the bottom of an MLS results page is somehow superior to a directory page.

My main point is that all factors usually are not equal. So people should consider more than just if a link is on a directory vs content page. The quality of either and placement within the site's hierarchy are major factors.

(hoping to incite a few reactions and as always, I am happy to be corrected...but you still have to argue past the point of >2% of traffic coming via unoptimized directory pages)
Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2005, 06:42 AM
frobn frobn is offline
Real Estate Web Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Key West, FL
Posts: 473
frobn is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Directory vs Content link trades

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cecil
I'm hearing more and more people obsess over the idea that they only want content page link trades instead of directory link trades.
Yes, some people may be obsessed because they heard form someone who heard from someone who is rumored to be a Big SEO guru, etc, etc, etc. My linking strategy is based on my situation, my observations and research for what will be the most efficient for my web sites.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cecil
First off...I agree. Content page trades are more valuable IF the links are surrounded by text and placed in a content friendly logical location within the page. If we're talking about a text link with anchor text only in a table with a bunch of other text links with anchor text only I'd say they aren't any more valuable than a directory link with nice descriptions after each link.
I would agree with the exception that Google tells us in their TrustRank that "the value of the link is proportional to the care taken in obtaining the link." (paraphrased, the quote is from memory.) My interpretation is that a page with many links reduces each link's value, your interpretation may be different.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cecil
That said, I think people undervalue the weight that google places on directories. As long as the directory is well done with good sized description text after each link, google is treating those pages and their links with great respect. Last time I checked, >2% of my total traffic was COMING IN from my directory pages. There was no significant optimization on that directory. It was just a directory of quality links with quality descriptions. And those descriptions capture people. In fact they still do.
I have no way of know how google values directories. There is some indications that they are devaluing directories. Again it is interpretation. I think the fact that you get close to 2% of your traffic from directories is more important than how google values a directory.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cecil
I've seen a few people who feel that a few anchor text only links tucked in the bottom of an MLS results page is somehow superior to a directory page.
I believe that google values links within the eco-system it is in. The anchor text is one element of the eco-system there are many others.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cecil
My main point is that all factors usually are not equal. So people should consider more than just if a link is on a directory vs content page. The quality of either and placement within the site's hierarchy are major factors.
We are in more in agreement than disagreement. My biggest complaint about linking strategies, whether directory or non-directory, is that they are not thought out.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cecil
(hoping to incite a few reactions and as always, I am happy to be corrected...but you still have to argue past the point of >2% of traffic coming via unoptimized directory pages)
I never argue with success.
Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2005, 11:07 PM
kensmith's Avatar
kensmith kensmith is offline
Uber Real Estate Webmaster
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,735
kensmith is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Directory vs Content link trades

The best link would come from a page with unique content talking about your area. Lets say 250-350 words that are only about your area. Your link would be within the text of the page where it made sense surrounded by lots of other keyword rich text.

The hard part is someone has to write the content, you have to find a like minded link partner, and you need to get someone to add an entire page to their site for you.

Now that is what I would call a quality link or links. To make it worth while I would say that you would want 4-5 links to different pages on your site in the text.

As for directory listings, they are still worth while. As for pages that are just full of links without any order...little to no value.
Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2005, 12:22 AM
Homesurfer's Avatar
Homesurfer Homesurfer is offline
Professional Contrarian
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 786
Homesurfer is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Yahoo to Homesurfer
Default Re: Directory vs Content link trades

This is how it works...(opinion)

If a site hasn't reached "authority" status, a link from a regular page has more benefit, but the link should also have accompanying information about you and where you work.

Once a site reaches "authority" status (which is almost impossible for a real estate agent site), then links from directories are quite beneficial, provided the page is not too "general" in nature. You want the directory page to be as specific (geographically) as possible.
__________________
Terry Light - Professional Contrarian
Office Phone - (949) 305-7995
RealEstateBytes.com
Real Estate Encyclopedia
Author for RealEstate ABC (Creator, too)
Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2005, 06:55 PM
Cecil's Avatar
Cecil Cecil is offline
Real Estate WebMaster
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 142
Cecil is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Directory vs Content link trades

Quote:
Originally Posted by realestateabc
then links from directories are quite beneficial, provided the page is not too "general" in nature. You want the directory page to be as specific (geographically) as possible.
Yes, as long as the directory is quality...then I believe it functions as a content page. Until G gets smart enough to tell the difference between a directory page and a content page (I'm not sure I could come up with an algo that could do that...product listings pages and directories look very similar) then it really boils down to page quality. I've always tried to keep my directory pages well themed. As a result every partner that gets added onto a particular page increases the already themed strength of that page. Of course that theme could be mortgages or arizona or spain. I suppose that's kind of "seo for directories" but it's a by product of making a quality directory (as opposed to an unorganized and non-thematic directory).

To sum up...it's all about quality. And if you have good quality, then I'll betcha that Directory=Content as far as G can tell.
Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2005, 05:21 PM
Tom_Clark's Avatar
Tom_Clark Tom_Clark is offline
Advancing Webmaster
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 74
Tom_Clark is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Directory vs Content link trades

It seems pretty obvious that if you've got juicy text descriptions wrapped around your links, they'll be more likely to be picked up by the engines. That would make sense.

I agree with Cecil though, the text descriptions in the directories serve as "content". Content pages only seem more valuable because:

- They've got more text content associated with the link.
- There are less links to share the PR with

.. The latter being more important...
Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2005, 07:06 AM
frobn frobn is offline
Real Estate Web Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Key West, FL
Posts: 473
frobn is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Directory vs Content link trades

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cecil
Yes, as long as the directory is quality...then I believe it functions as a content page. Until G gets smart enough to tell the difference between a directory page and a content page (I'm not sure I could come up with an algo that could do that...product listings pages and directories look very similar) then it really boils down to page quality.
I agree that in some, in my opinion, very few, instances that the search engines may have a difficult time distinquishing between a content and directory page. How much can a page content or directory be worth when links are piled higher and deeper? How much theme does a page with 75 New York real esate links on an Alabama site have? What ties the links together to give it relevance as measured by a search engine? If someone takes the effort to address these and similar issues that distinguish a directory page from a content page then why not take the easier route of a pure content page. In my opinion, a well structured content page with a few "relevant" links will be worth much more to both your site and your link partners.

Disclaimer: I am expressing my opinion, I am not suggesting that anyone change their ways. However, I would like to exchange links with SEOs and webmasters who have similar ideas.
Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2005, 03:59 PM
SkiRE's Avatar
SkiRE SkiRE is offline
Real Estate WebMaster
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 203
SkiRE is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Directory vs Content link trades

"How much theme does a page with 75 New York real esate links on an Alabama site have?" ..great question....but I think that google does everything on a page basis. Which means that a well written State based link or content page from any theme site is going to hold some relevance if your keyword contains your state name.

Every ranking technique in google's patents deals with pages and links to and from pages. PR is page based, serps are page based...so why shouldn't themes be page based???
Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2005, 08:50 AM
kensmith's Avatar
kensmith kensmith is offline
Uber Real Estate Webmaster
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,735
kensmith is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Directory vs Content link trades

Quote:
Originally Posted by frobn
How much theme does a page with 75 New York real esate links on an Alabama site have? What ties the links together to give it relevance as measured by a search engine?
The theme of the site is real estate. Real estate is what ties it together and why there is plently of relevance IMO.

A content page talking about Agent Joe Blow that has 5 text links on the right hand column has the same if not less relevance than a directory taht is broken out by states and all of the titles and other on page SEO are for that state. Take a look at my Utah Real Estate or Canada Real Estate page to see what I would consider a good directory page. I figure I will not be adding anymore links to sites in Canada at this point as I don't want to dilute the PR any further.

The most worthless link you can get is a "links page" that has agents, mortgage, and other links to just about anything on it. There is no order to it, no theme, no relevance, and many get dropped by G.

More I think about it I am not sure that a link on an agents content page is really any higher in value than a directory that is done correctly.
__________________
The Suburban House Hunters Team would like to thank REW members for past referrals! We are never to busy to handle your Chicago area referrals.

Always looking for quality unique content for our real estate agent blog, PM me if interested in writing a post.

My thoughts on the Sarasota Association of REALTORS actions.

Last edited by kensmith; 09-12-2008 at 11:04 PM. Reason: Removed dead links
Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2005, 10:00 AM
frobn frobn is offline
Real Estate Web Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Key West, FL
Posts: 473
frobn is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Directory vs Content link trades

Quote:
Originally Posted by frobn
Disclaimer: I am expressing my opinion, I am not suggesting that anyone change their ways. However, I would like to exchange links with SEOs and webmasters who have similar ideas.
I want to re-enforce it is my opinion. Nothing more. For anyone who might be interested, here is a the longer version of my Linking Strategies
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



For our members

Main Sections

IDX Coverage Areas

Spiders Welcome

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.