Thought that would get your attention

Was just looking at the NAR stats for internet users, what blew me away was that the highest % by far of actions was "drove by / viewed home" at 75%

How are these people driving by? They were able to access the address the property address from the internet.

Actions taken as result of using Internet site:
Drove by/viewed a home - 75%
Walked through a home viewed online- 57%
Found agent used to search/buy home - 21%

Now I am not totally against giving address information to a visitor, because obviously it is what they want - however I just wanted to cite these stats and state my opinion that it is IMPERATIVE that you capture the visitors information before you provide address details. Otherwise you run the risk of losing a prospect to the agent sign that is in front of the home.

This has been said before many times, but I hadn't seen the stat, and so wanted to share it with you.

__________________
Want to save up to 50% off Real estate webmasters product websites & common upgrades? Check out my latest blog post regarding our end of the year sale.

Thank you for sharing.

My wife and I have this conversation almost daily.

__________________
Mobile Homes For Sale in Arizona ~ Sales Training ~ Mobile Homes For Sale

Lol to funny - Of course even after you capture the lead, they will still drive by the house if you provide address info and you still run the risk of losing the prospect - however at least with the lead you have a chance

If you have quick and decent follow up, you will speak to the prospect before they have a chance to leave their computer. They might be planning to hop in the car to check out the home, but after the phonecall you will likely be driving them

__________________
Want to save up to 50% off Real estate webmasters product websites & common upgrades? Check out my latest blog post regarding our end of the year sale.

Myself, I don't give out addresses unless I have a signed Broker Agreement.

__________________
Mobile Homes For Sale in Arizona ~ Sales Training ~ Mobile Homes For Sale

Personally, I fail to see the logic of withholding addresses in any reasonably competitive market... it's an invitation for the potential customer to go elsewhere, given that dozens of sites that will provide the addresses without registration (IDX).

WolfNet's VOW2 program is a prime example of "give until it hurts", and why a highly restrictive website will never compete with an "open" website in an equal market. Sure, you may not convert as many leads on a percentage basis, but you will retain far more actual business (income) on a volume basis.

That's my 2 cents, anyway... what do I know.

-Matt

__________________
PMPVOWs.com Lead Programmer, MLSNI IDX/VOW solution provider

Just a quick (okay, it wound up long) note about the drive-bys --
I also think there is some value for the Agent if they don't necessarily have to "show" the potential customers every single house. A lot of the buyers' gut feeling can be established at the curb.

The purpose of a VOW is to empower the client to search on their own, at their own pace and leisure, allowing them to explore their myriad possibilities without limitation. A Realtor will always remain valuable for their familiarity with the area, contract negotiations, and general "transaction management" details.

As long as VOW/IDX policies exist, you don't have much of a choice... Dell or be Delled, as they say.
-Matt

__________________
PMPVOWs.com Lead Programmer, MLSNI IDX/VOW solution provider

What are your thoughts on being the only provider of "full" information in searching for a home in a particular market. Do you feel that if you have the only site that has full information (address, price, map, etc.), when other sites provide information only in piecemeal, will you win the confidence and business of the visitor?

__________________
285 Columbus Lofts - New 63-unit Boston loft development in the former Red Cross building
FP3 Boston Condos - FP3 Fort Point Channel Boston Seaport Condos
Boston Real Estate - Providing Google Map based search of condo developments

Absolutely. This was the case with eRealty 5 years ago -- they were hitting something like 50% of the Internet buyers. While not everyone used them, it did generate quick familiarity (enough to prompt a $25M buyout).

-Matt

__________________
PMPVOWs.com Lead Programmer, MLSNI IDX/VOW solution provider

Many will disagree with you, including me, but I hope everyone else listens to you anyway.

Well, certainly the market dynamics are different in each metro area, but here WolfNet was the only provider that tried a "VOW 2.0" implementation, and they had the backing of KW regional to help.

A year later, and most of the top-performing KW agents have switched to either our service or BirdView, because VOW 2.0 (or perhaps WolfNet's implementation of it) didn't work. I can't help but beat the drum that showing both listings and the listing brokerage to an unengaged buyer is at least half an invitation to go elsewhere.

Again, NAR is pulling the IDX policy once the DOJ mess is cleared up, and MLSNI has committed to not adopting the ILD policy. At least one can infer that the brokers in this area see limited value in IDX (or ILD) and lead capture -- as it is in the real office -- is the most important aspect in converting leads to buyers.

-Matt

__________________
PMPVOWs.com Lead Programmer, MLSNI IDX/VOW solution provider